I could find at first the conception of ‘lecture aesthetics’ not only in the paper of prof.―482―* Korea Journal, vol. 47, no.３Autumn 2007, Korean National Commission for UNESCO.* Masahiro Hamashita, Aesthetic as a Discipline for Human Existence: an Essay on the History of ModernAesthetics in Japan, Tokyo, pp. 93−94; Masahiro Hamashita, “Extending Meanings of Aesthetics and theEthical Moment,” Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art（G. Fløistad ed.）, vol.９, 2007Springer, p. 30.Furthermore I checked over the possibility how the traditional aesthetic characteristics can besuited to Korean contemporary art. Various problems brought forward in the paper have somerelation with Japanese aesthetics and art. So it will be meaningful to discuss them with somedepth in the K-J Aesthetic Association.simplicity）, naturalness, humor, and ‘nonghyeonseong’（弄絃性、freely vibrating withoutadherence to formality）. Judging from the viewpoint of aesthetic category, they should not becovered with conception of ‘beauty.’Instead of beauty, the ‘aesthetic’（美的encouraged, being in accord with that of Prof. M. Hamashita.*in order to investigate the Korean aesthetic. I divide the lineage of the ‘Japanese aesthetic’study into two groups: one was the school of so called ‘lecture aesthetics’（講壇美學）played a leading role by the professors of Tokyo Imperial University, on whom the Germanaesthetics had a strong influence. The other school was for the ‘traditional Japaneseaesthetics,’ whose members laid much stress on Japanese traditional art: it started by E.Fenollosa, then O. Kakuzo, and Y. Muneyoshi.* Kim, Mun-hwan, “Pre-historic Evolution of Korean Modern Aesthetics”, A Preliminary Study on theAesthetics in Korea, Korea University, 1994, p. 340.** M. Hamashita, Aesthetics as a Discipline for Human Existence, p. 200.Last year I wrote a paper “‘The Aesthetic’ in Traditional Korean Art and Its Influence onModern Life.”* In it proposed some aesthetic point of views concerning aesthetic categories.Ⅰ. Generally Korean aesthetic characteristics are summarized as follows: naïveté（orⅡ. History of the ‘Japanese aesthetic’（美的Kim Mun-hwan,* but also recently in the book of prof. M. Hamashita.** If consideringthat prof. Kim wrote the paper during his sabbatical leave in Japan, the conception seemsto be generalized in the field of Japanese humane studies.Kwon, Young-pil（Inv. Prof. Sangji Univ.））can be suitable. Such my opinion is）study is very suggestive、美學的
元のページ ../index.html#493